Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG) Contact About GILS
Home/News & Analysis/GILS Decent Work Scorecard for Georgia: 15 Indicators, Sourced — and Why We Withdrew a Single-Number Index

GILS Decent Work Scorecard for Georgia: 15 Indicators, Sourced — and Why We Withdrew a Single-Number Index

Labour underutilisation dashboard — GILS Georgia
Photo: Unsplash / CC0

An earlier version of this page presented a single “Decent Work Index” score for Georgia. GILS could not document the methodology and data behind that score to the standard we now require, and it has been withdrawn. In its place, this scorecard sets out 15 indicators across the ILO’s decent work dimensions, each with its latest value, its direction and its source — and no composite score that would hide the evidence behind a single number.

Key Findings

  • Employment opportunities are weak and stagnant: unemployment was 13.9% in 2025, the employment rate 46.9%, and composite labour underutilisation 28.8% in 2024.
  • Earnings are rising fast (GEL 2,466 a month in Q4 2025, +11.2%) and absolute poverty fell to 7.1% in 2025 — but the statutory minimum wage remains GEL 20.
  • Equality indicators are mixed: the adjusted gender pay gap fell to 11.4% (hourly, 2024), while women’s participation fell to 44.2% in 2025.
  • Social security and social dialogue are the weakest dimensions: no unemployment insurance, union membership of at most about one in six employees, and no official collective bargaining data.
  • Recorded workplace deaths fell to 32 in 2025, but Georgia has not ratified the two ILO fundamental conventions on occupational safety and health.

1. Why a Scorecard, Not an Index

Composite indices are attractive because they summarise many indicators in one number. But they depend on choices — which indicators, which benchmarks, which weights — that are rarely visible to readers, and a single score can move for reasons unrelated to workers’ lives. Georgia also lacks several of the data series an index would need, such as collective bargaining coverage. GILS therefore presents the evidence indicator by indicator, organised by the ILO’s decent work dimensions, with sources for each.

2. The Scorecard

Table 1. GILS Decent Work Scorecard for Georgia
Dimension Indicator Latest value Direction Source
Employment opportunities Unemployment rate 13.9% (2025) Unchanged from 2024 Geostat
Employment opportunities Employment rate (15+) 46.9% (2025) Down 0.2 pts Geostat
Employment opportunities Composite labour underutilisation (LU4) 28.8% (2024) About twice the unemployment rate since 2020 Geostat via PMCG
Employment opportunities Unemployment, ages 15–19 39.0% (2025) Up from 36.3% (2024) Geostat
Adequate earnings Average monthly earnings GEL 2,466 (Q4 2025) Up 11.2% year-on-year Geostat
Adequate earnings Statutory minimum wage (private) GEL 20 (since 1999) Unchanged; 0.8% of average earnings Presidential Order No. 351
Adequate earnings Absolute poverty rate 7.1% (2025) Down from 9.4% (2024) Geostat
Equal opportunity Women’s labour force participation 44.2% vs 66.3% men (2025) Women down 0.7 pts Geostat
Equal opportunity Adjusted hourly gender pay gap 11.4% (2024) Down from 15.9% (2020) Geostat
Stability and security Informal employment 37.1% (2022) — ILO (Pignatti, 2026)
Social security Unemployment insurance None — —
Safe work Recorded workplace deaths 32 (2025) Reported −46% vs 2024 Labour Inspection Service
Social dialogue Union membership, share of employees ≤15.7% (upper bound) — GILS calculation (GTUC, Geostat)
Social dialogue Collective bargaining coverage Not measured — No official statistic
Rights at work ILO fundamental conventions ratified 8 of 10 (not C155, C187) — EU Twinning Fiche (2023); ILO

Sources and calculations are documented in the linked GILS analyses and references below.

Selected decent work indicators, Georgia (%)Selected decent work indicators, Georgia (%)0%15%30%45%60%13.9%Unemploy-ment 202546.9%Employmentrate 202544.2%Women’sparticip. 202528.8%Labour under-utilisation 202437.1%Informalemploy. 202215.7%Union members(max.)Sources: Geostat; PMCG (2025); Pignatti (2026); GILS calculation (union membership)
Figure 1. Selected percentage indicators from the scorecard.

3. What the Scorecard Shows

Growth without inclusion

The indicators that have improved most — earnings and poverty — are those driven by economic growth. The indicators that have stalled or worsened — participation, women’s participation, youth unemployment — are those that depend on institutions: childcare, employment services, social dialogue and labour market policy.

The institutional gap

The weakest dimensions are those requiring institutions Georgia lacks or has only recently built: a functioning minimum wage, unemployment insurance, collective bargaining and full ratification of fundamental conventions. These are also areas where EU candidate status brings benchmarks that Georgia does not yet meet.

The data gap

Several important indicators cannot be measured at all, or only infrequently: collective bargaining coverage, informal employment after 2022, accident rates per worker, and the employment of people with functional disabilities. Better measurement is itself a decent work priority.

4. Limitations

Indicators refer to different years depending on availability. Some values are GILS calculations from official data. The scorecard does not assign weights or an overall score, and comparisons with other countries are not included because comparable data were not verified for this edition.

5. Conclusion

Georgia’s labour market shows rising pay and falling poverty alongside weak employment, low participation and thin labour institutions. A transparent scorecard makes clear where progress is happening and where it is not. GILS will update it annually.

GILS Recommendations

  1. Adopt a national decent work monitoring framework, using ILO decent work indicators, published annually by Geostat.
  2. Fill the data gaps: collective bargaining coverage, regular informality estimates, accident rates per worker and disability employment.
  3. Prioritise the institutional dimensions: minimum wage law, unemployment insurance and social dialogue.
  4. Use the Decent Work Country Programme to set targets for the weakest indicators.

GILS Position

GILS withdrew a single-number index it could not fully document. We believe evidence on decent work should be transparent and checkable. This scorecard is our commitment to that standard.

References

  1. GBC (2026). The unemployment rate in 2025 has not changed — 13.9%. gbc.ge
  2. Geostat (2026). Average Monthly Nominal Earnings of Employees (IV Quarter, 2025). geostat.ge
  3. GBC (2025). The gender pay gap is almost 20%. gbc.ge
  4. PMCG Research (2025). Labor Market Overview: Georgia, Issue 151. research.pmcg-i.com
  5. Pignatti, C. (2026). Recent Trends on Informal Employment in Georgia. ILO Working Paper 159. doi.org/10.54394/MOJI5185
  6. Georgia Today (2026). Labor Inspection Service 2025 report: 32 workplace fatalities. georgiatoday.ge
  7. EU Twinning Fiche (2023). GE 21 NDICI SO 02 23. esteri.it
  8. ILO (2013). Decent Work Indicators: Guidelines for Producers and Users of Statistical and Legal Framework Indicators. Geneva: ILO.

Suggested citation: GILS Research Team (2026). Decent Work Scorecard for Georgia. Editor: G. Pkhakadze. Georgian Institute of Labour Studies, Tbilisi. labour.edu.ge

GILS analyses are prepared with AI-assisted drafting. All figures and claims are verified against the cited primary sources and reviewed under the responsibility of the Editor.

Share this analysisX / TwitterLinkedInFacebook