Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG)ContactAbout GILS
EN  /  KA
About GILS

Governance

GILS is accountable to the public, not to any funder, government, or institutional patron — and this page explains exactly how that accountability works.

How GILS Is Run

Governance Structure

GILS operates under a governance framework designed to protect its independence, ensure research quality, and maintain accountability to the public — not to any funder, government, or institutional patron.

As an initiative of the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG), GILS inherits PHIG's non-commercial, non-partisan legal status under Georgian law. All GILS research outputs are subject to internal peer review before publication. No output is suppressed, modified, or delayed at the request of any external party.

Leadership

Institutional Leadership

Founder & Director

Prof. Giorgi Pkhakadze, MD, MPH, PhD

Responsible for GILS's strategic direction, research agenda, and institutional positioning. Prof. Pkhakadze brings 25+ years of experience across WHO, ILO, UN agencies, and academic institutions to the role. He holds no government position and receives no state salary in connection with GILS.

Parent Institution

Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG)

PHIG — founded 2011, legally constituted as a non-commercial entity under Georgian law — is the institutional home and legal framework within which GILS operates. PHIG's Chair is Prof. Pkhakadze. PHIG provides administrative, legal, and infrastructure support to GILS.

Research Quality

Research Fellows Network

GILS maintains an affiliated network of independent researchers drawn from CELSI (Central European Labour Studies Institute), IZA (Institute of Labor Economics), and Georgian academic institutions. Fellows review methodology, challenge findings, and contribute to working papers and index construction.

Editorial Oversight

Georgian Medical Journal (GMJ)

Academic outputs connected to GILS's occupational health and safety knowledge hub are subject to GMJ's standard peer review process — double-blind, independent of GILS's institutional interests. GMJ is Georgia's leading open-access medical journal (ISSN 3088-4322).

Decision-Making

How Decisions Are Made

Decision TypeWho DecidesSafeguard
Research agenda & topicsGILS Director, in consultation with Research FellowsNo external party may commission or suppress a research topic
Data methodologyResearch team, documented in published methodology notesAll methodology publicly available for independent audit
Publication decisionsGILS Director; academic outputs via GMJ peer reviewNo output withheld at request of funder or partner
Funding acceptanceGILS Director with PHIG oversightNo funding accepted from entities whose conduct GILS monitors
Corrections & retractionsGILS Director; public notice requiredAll corrections documented publicly on this website
Partnership agreementsPHIG BoardNo partnership may restrict GILS's analytical independence
Accountability

How We Are Held Accountable

GILS operates in the public domain. Our accountability is to the users of our research — policymakers, researchers, trade unions, employers, journalists, and citizens — not to any private patron. Accountability is enforced through transparency, not through a board of directors or a shareholder structure.

GILS publishes its conflict-of-interest policy and funding disclosures on the Independence & Funding page. Any party that believes GILS has violated its governance commitments is invited to contact us directly at info@accreditation.ge.

Questions about how GILS operates?

Our independence and funding disclosures are published in full.

Independence & Funding Our Story Contact GILS