Law No. 3271-IIs · 27 October 2015. Full text, article breakdown, amendment history, enforcement data, and policy analysis. All texts available on Matsne.gov.ge.
Article summaries are GILS translations and interpretations of the Georgian original. Consult the official text on Matsne.gov.ge for authoritative content.
Georgia's civil service reform since 2015 has professionalised the public sector considerably. Merit-based recruitment is now standard across central government, and the Civil Service Bureau provides credible oversight. However, public sector employment still carries significant political exposure at senior levels — formal protections for non-political civil servants are stronger on paper than in practice, particularly around local government where political turnover frequently affects non-political staff. Public sector wages at ~GEL 2,950/month (2024) are above the national average but below the Tbilisi living wage for families. See Living Wage →
Trade union density in the public sector is approximately 35% — higher than the national average of 15% — reflecting GTUC's historic strength in public sector unions (teachers, healthcare workers, civil servants).
The Law on Public Service governs employment conditions for Georgia's approximately 130,000 civil servants — establishing a separate employment framework from the Labour Code for state employees. Key differences: civil servants have stronger dismissal protections (can only be dismissed for specific grounds, with administrative appeal); but weaker collective bargaining rights (no sector-wide union negotiation; individual employment conditions set by law and government resolution).
Public sector employment represents approximately 7.5% of total employment and 18% of formal wage employment. Public sector wages have grown moderately (average GEL 1,650/month in 2023) but remain below private formal sector equivalents in comparable occupations, creating recruitment challenges in healthcare, education, and IT — the three sectors where Georgia most needs qualified public employees.
The Law on Public Service is evidence, not advocacy. Its value lies in grounding policy discussion in what employers, workers, and the labour market actually show — not what is assumed. GILS commits to annual data collection and transparent methodology so that Georgian labour policy is made on the basis of evidence rather than ideology or political convenience.
Current sample (450 enterprises) is too small for sector-level analysis. Expand to 1,000: stratified by region, sector, and size. Enables: reliable sector-specific findings; regional employer demand mapping; time-series trend analysis. Cost: GEL 35K annually. ILO co-funding available.
ILO Employer Survey methodology · World Bank Enterprise Survey · Geostat business register sample frameCreate a joint GILS/ESDC Skills Gap Database: employer-reported hard-to-fill vacancies matched against ESDC training programme output by occupation. Identifies: training programmes not filling vacancies; occupations with vacancies but no training supply. Updates quarterly. Powers ESDC training commissioning decisions.
ESDC Employment Promotion Law Art.15 · Cedefop skills intelligence model · GILS data infrastructure34% of employers offer any training — increase to 60% through: (1) ESDC employer-led training subsidy (Art.13) — 70% reimbursement, well-publicised; (2) GILS 'Employer of the Year' award for training investment; (3) University-employer curriculum co-design workshops (GILS facilitates, MLHSA co-sponsors). Target: 50 formal employer-education partnerships by 2026.
Germany dual system employer partnerships · GILS facilitation capacity · MLHSA ESDC employer relationsCurrent survey is nationally aggregated — masking the very different employer landscapes in Tbilisi vs. regions. Develop regional employer modules: 3 regions (Adjara, Imereti, Kvemo Kartli) with n=100 each. Enables: regional ALMP targeting; regional skills forecasting; regional investment facilitation.
Georgia regional economic development strategy · EU ENPARD regional components · MRDI partnership90% of employer surveys cover private sector. The public sector (130,000 civil servants) has significant recruitment and retention challenges — particularly in healthcare, education, and IT. Commission a Public Employer Survey: Civil Service Bureau + MLHSA + GILS; 200 public entities; focus on: hard-to-fill positions, turnover rates, pay competitiveness. First edition 2025.
Civil Service Bureau capacity · World Bank PFM programme · ILO public service employment data| Convention / Standard | Subject | Ratified | Compliance | Key Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C142 | Human Resources Development | 1993 | Partial | VET misaligned with employer demand; employer engagement in training 34% |
| C122 | Employment Policy | 1993 | Partial | ESDC skills forecasting weak; employer survey not yet systematic |
| C088 | Employment Service | 1993 | Partial | Employer engagement in ESDC improving but limited to vacancy posting |