Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG) Contact About GILS
EN  /  KA
Data Tool · GILS

Strike Action and Industrial Disputes — Georgia

History and data on collective labour action in Georgia — strike frequency, sectors affected, outcomes, and the institutional framework for dispute resolution.

Source: LIS / GTUC / MLHSAILO C87 · C98Updated: 2024
Key Figures
Industrial Disputes Overview — Georgia 2018-2023
4
Recorded strikes 2018-2023
Extremely low by regional standards
~2,800
Workers involved in disputes
Primarily mining and energy sector
3
Major sectors with disputes
Mining, energy, manufacturing
0
Tripartite dispute resolution cases
No formal tripartite mechanism used

Georgia has an exceptionally low rate of recorded industrial action. Only 4 strikes were officially recorded between 2018 and 2023 — compared to hundreds annually in comparable EU neighbourhood economies (Moldova, Armenia, Ukraine). This low strike rate does not reflect harmonious labour relations: it reflects the weakness of trade unions (collective bargaining coverage below 5%), fear of dismissal, and the absence of a robust dispute resolution framework.

The most significant labour disputes in Georgia have occurred in extractive industries and energy — sectors with stronger trade union traditions. The 2019 Chiatura manganese mine dispute (involving 1,200 workers and resulting in a 3-week work stoppage) was the largest recorded labour action in recent history. Wages and safety conditions were the primary issues.

Dispute History
Major Labour Disputes — Georgia 2014-2024
YearSector / EmployerWorkersTypeMain IssueOutcome
2014Rustavi Azot (chemicals)340Work stoppageWage arrearsPartial settlement
2016Tkibuli coal mine280Sit-in protestOSH conditions / wagesMediated settlement
2019Chiatura Manganese (Georgian Manganese)1,200Strike (3 weeks)Wages + safetyPartial — 12% wage increase
2020Gardabani Power Station180Work-to-ruleRedundancy termsCourt settlement
2021Poti Sea Port (TBC)420Protest actionCollective agreement termsOngoing / unresolved
2022–23Multiple construction sites~380Wage disputes (LIS)Wage theft / non-paymentLIS enforcement actions
Note: Recorded strike data in Georgia is incomplete. LIS records formal disputes; many work stoppages go unrecorded. GTUC estimates actual number of significant disputes is 3-4 times the officially recorded figures. Source: GTUC, LIS Annual Reports, MLHSA.
Legal Framework
Right to Strike — Georgia
ProvisionLegal BasisStatus
Right to strikeConstitution Art.33; Labour Code Art.49Guaranteed
Strike notice requirementLabour Code Art.507 days written notice to employer
Essential services restrictionsLabour Code Art.51Minimum service obligations in: healthcare, energy, water, transport
LockoutLabour Code Art.52Employer lockout permitted as counter-measure
Dismissal for strike participationLabour Code Art.53Prohibited — but enforcement weak
Mediation and arbitrationLabour Code Art.47-48Available but rarely used; no mandatory pre-strike mediation
Sources: Georgian Trade Union Confederation (GTUC) Annual Reports 2018-2023 · Labour Inspection Service Annual Reports 2018-2023 · MLHSA Labour Dispute Statistics · ILO NORMLEX Georgia · Labour Code of Georgia (Matsne) · GILS analysis.
GILS Analysis
Why Georgia's Low Strike Rate Is Not Good News

A low strike rate typically reflects either harmonious labour relations (workers are satisfied, disputes are resolved early) or suppressed labour voice (workers cannot or will not exercise their rights). In Georgia's case, the evidence strongly points to the latter. With collective bargaining coverage below 5%, trade union membership at approximately 12% of formal workers (mainly in public sector and a few large enterprises), and persistent reports of anti-union employer behaviour, the low strike rate reflects the absence of effective collective representation — not the presence of good labour relations.

The comparison with the EU is instructive. France averages 80+ strikes annually per 100,000 workers; Germany 12; Estonia 3. Georgia's effective rate of less than 1 is consistent with the most authoritarian labour regimes — not with a country that has ratified ILO C87 (Freedom of Association) and C98 (Collective Bargaining). The gap between legal rights and practical reality is the central industrial relations problem.

Legal framework: The right to strike is constitutionally guaranteed and the Labour Code strike procedure is straightforward (7 days notice). Dismissal for strike participation is prohibited. These are the right foundations. The 2020 Labour Code reform strengthened anti-retaliatory protections. The legal architecture for industrial action is adequate.
Practical suppression: Despite legal protections, workers report widespread fear of dismissal or non-renewal of fixed-term contracts for union activity or strike participation. Enforcement of dismissal prohibition is weak — the LIS has limited capacity to investigate anti-union discrimination. The Public Defender has documented cases of covert pressure on workers not to join unions. The gap between law and practice is substantial.
International Perspectives
What Other Institutions Say
GTUC (Georgian Trade Union Confederation)
Georgia's industrial relations system is structurally dysfunctional. Collective bargaining coverage is below 5% — meaning 95% of private sector workers have no collective agreement governing their wages and conditions. The few strikes that occur are in sectors with longer union traditions (mining, energy) and typically succeed in achieving partial demands. GTUC documents 15-20 significant disputes annually that do not escalate to formal strike because workers fear retaliation. (GTUC Annual Report 2023)
ILO Committee on Freedom of Association
ILO's supervisory bodies have received complaints regarding Georgia's treatment of trade union rights. Key concerns: the 7-day strike notice allows employers time to prepare replacement workers; anti-union dismissal is prohibited but enforcement is inadequate; the essential services minimum service requirement is defined broadly, potentially restricting strikes in sectors beyond genuine necessity. (ILO CFA Georgia Review 2022)
Public Defender of Georgia
The Public Defender receives 20-30 complaints annually related to labour rights violations — including anti-union dismissals, coercion not to join unions, and refusal to engage in collective bargaining. Employer impunity is the core problem: LIS lacks the authority to impose sanctions that deter anti-union behaviour. The Administrative Code fine for anti-union discrimination (GEL 500) is trivially small. (PDO Annual Report 2023)
Employers' Association of Georgia (GEA)
GEA supports social dialogue and collective bargaining at enterprise level but opposes sector-level bargaining, which they argue is incompatible with the diversity of Georgian enterprise sizes and conditions. GEA notes that many industrial disputes arise from poor internal communication and HR practices rather than fundamental disagreements about pay — and proposes a state-subsidised employment mediator service as a first response before escalation to strikes. (GEA Industrial Relations Position 2023)
GILS Position Statement

Georgia's industrial relations system is characterised by formal rights and practical weakness. Workers have the right to strike, to organise, and to bargain collectively — but exercising these rights carries real risks that law does not adequately address. GILS does not advocate for more strikes: it advocates for the conditions in which genuine collective bargaining makes strikes unnecessary. A 5% collective bargaining coverage rate — in a country with 30+ years of formal labour relations — is an institutional failure. The social dialogue investment needed to reach 40% coverage within 10 years is modest in fiscal terms; the returns in reduced inequality and labour market stability would be substantial.

— GILS Research Position on Industrial Relations and Social Dialogue, September 2026
GILS Policy Recommendations
Five Priority Reforms
Recommendation 01
Mandatory pre-dispute mediation — Labour Mediation Service

Establish a dedicated Labour Mediation Service (LMS) within MLHSA: trained mediators available within 5 working days of dispute notification. Mediation mandatory before formal strike action (except in urgent safety cases). International evidence: mediation resolves 65-70% of disputes without work stoppage. Cost: GEL 1.2M annually (10 mediators + administration). Models: ACAS (UK), Mediation Board (Estonia).

UK (ACAS — resolves 90% of cases) · Estonia (Labour Dispute Committee) · Lithuania (labour mediation service)
Recommendation 02
Strengthen anti-union discrimination enforcement

Current GEL 500 fine for anti-union dismissal is trivially small — employers routinely pay rather than reinstate. Amend Labour Code: anti-union dismissal fine increased to GEL 5,000-15,000 per case; LIS has authority to order reinstatement with back pay; employee who wins anti-union case receives costs plus 3-month salary additional compensation. This changes the employer calculus fundamentally.

Germany (reinstatement + costs for wrongful anti-union dismissal) · Estonia (doubled compensation) · ILO C98 supervisory recommendations
Recommendation 03
Collective bargaining coverage target — 40% by 2030

Current 5% coverage is a national industrial relations failure. National action plan: (1) public sector — comprehensive public sector collective agreement covering all government employees (immediate, government can do this unilaterally); (2) sector bargaining — pilot in 3 sectors (mining, construction, hospitality); (3) employer incentive — Labour Compliance certification for employers with collective agreements, giving preference in public tenders.

Germany (80% coverage via extension clauses) · Spain (sector agreements) · Georgia DWCP target (collective bargaining)
Recommendation 04
Tripartite Social Dialogue revival — binding mechanism

Georgia's Tripartite Commission (MLHSA + GEA + GTUC) exists but its recommendations are advisory only and it meets irregularly. Reform: (1) mandatory quarterly meetings with published minutes; (2) annual National Social Dialogue Report submitted to Parliament; (3) tripartite agreement on minimum wage and sector priorities binding on government; (4) ILO technical assistance for secretariat. Social dialogue is cheaper than industrial conflict.

ILO C144 (tripartite consultation) · Estonia (Social Dialogue Council) · Lithuania (tripartite council)
Recommendation 05
OSH as industrial relations flashpoint — priority intervention

Analysis of Georgia's limited strike record shows OSH (occupational safety and health) is the most common trigger for work stoppages — Chiatura 2019, Tkibuli 2016, construction disputes 2022-23. Prevention: (1) joint OSH committees mandatory for workplaces with 50+ employees (worker-elected, with real authority to halt dangerous work); (2) LIS priority inspection of sectors with previous disputes; (3) OSH complaint hotline with guaranteed response within 48 hours.

ILO C155 (OSH) · Georgia OSH Law (implement fully) · UK (joint safety committees — mandatory for 50+ employees)
ILO Standards — Georgia
International Compliance Status
ILO ConventionSubjectRatifiedComplianceKey Gap
C87Freedom of Association and Protection 1993PoorUnion membership 12%; anti-union dismissal unpunished; effective collective representation absent
C98Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining 1993Poor5% collective bargaining coverage; employers routinely refuse to bargain
C154Collective Bargaining (Promotion) Not ratifiedn/aNo obligation to promote collective bargaining at sector or national level
C151Labour Relations (Public Service) Not ratifiedn/aPublic sector workers' collective bargaining rights not specifically protected