Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG) Contact About GILS
EN  /  KA
Data Tool · GILS

Labour Cost Index — Georgia

Total cost of labour per unit of output — wages, social contributions, and non-wage costs — compared across sectors and South Caucasus neighbours.

Source: Geostat / NBGILO Unit Labour CostsUpdated: 2024
Key Figures
Labour Cost Overview — Georgia 2023
GEL 2,180
Average total labour cost per employee/month
Wages + 2% employer pension contribution
~20%
Effective total tax wedge on labour
vs EU average ~36%
4th
Lowest labour costs in EU neighbourhood
After Moldova, Armenia, Ukraine
+6.8%
Average real labour cost growth
2020–2023 CAGR

Georgia's total labour cost (wage + statutory employer contributions) is among the lowest in the EU neighbourhood. The tax wedge on labour — the gap between what an employer pays and what a worker takes home — is approximately 20%, compared to an EU average of 36%. This reflects Georgia's flat tax structure (20% income tax, 2% employer pension contribution) with no payroll tax, unemployment insurance levy, or healthcare contribution.

Low labour costs have been a competitive advantage for Georgia in attracting FDI, particularly in manufacturing, logistics, and business process outsourcing. However, the same low cost structure reflects inadequate social protection — no unemployment insurance means employers bear no cost for dismissal, and the absence of a meaningful minimum wage means there is no floor below which competition on labour costs cannot drive wages.

Labour Cost Components
What Employers Pay Beyond Gross Wage — Georgia 2023
Cost ComponentRateMonthly GEL (avg worker)Share of total
Gross wage (worker's salary)—GEL 1,82184%
Employer pension contribution2% of grossGEL 361.7%
Effective income tax cost (employer-side)AdministrativeGEL 803.7%
Non-wage benefits (avg formal employer)VariableGEL 1507%
OSH compliance costs (avg)VariableGEL 502.3%
Recruitment / turnover costs (amortised)VariableGEL 432%
Total Labour Cost—GEL 2,180100%
Regional Comparison
Monthly Average Total Labour Cost — South Caucasus + Neighbours 2023 (USD)
Germany (reference)
USD 5,400
USD 5,400
Estonia (EU member)
USD 3,510
USD 3,510
Poland
USD 2,810
USD 2,810
Romania
USD 2,050
USD 2,050
Turkey
USD 1,620
USD 1,620
Georgia
USD 810
USD 810
Armenia
USD 700
USD 700
Moldova
USD 595
USD 595
Sources: Geostat Average Monthly Wages 2023 · NBG exchange rates · Eurostat Labour Cost Survey (EU countries) · ILO ILOSTAT unit labour cost database · IMF Country Reports · GILS calculations. All figures nominal USD at 2023 average exchange rates.
GILS Analysis
Georgia's Labour Cost Competitiveness: Advantage and Its Limits

At approximately USD 810/month total labour cost (2023), Georgia is highly competitive on labour costs within the EU neighbourhood — roughly 15% of German levels and 40% of Polish levels. This cost advantage has driven FDI in manufacturing (automotive parts, textiles, food processing) and BPO (business process outsourcing, call centres). However, the competitiveness calculation is changing rapidly.

Real labour costs have risen 6.8% annually since 2020 — significantly faster than productivity growth (3.2% annually). Unit Labour Costs (ULC — the ratio of labour cost to output) have risen 3.5% annually in real terms, eroding the competitiveness advantage. Without productivity-driven growth, Georgia risks competing on labour cost with lower-wage economies (Central Asia, parts of Africa) rather than moving toward a high-skill, higher-wage model.

Competitive advantage: Georgia's 20% tax wedge (EU avg: 36%) is a genuine competitive advantage for formal employment. Low non-wage costs reduce total labour cost well below regional peers. The flat-rate pension contribution (2% employer) is predictable and low-burden for employers.
Productivity challenge: Unit labour costs rising faster than productivity means the competitiveness advantage is eroding. The same low-cost structure reflects an underdeveloped social protection system. No unemployment insurance means no automatic stabiliser during downturns. No payroll-funded healthcare means the fiscal burden falls on general taxation.
International Perspectives
What Other Institutions Say
World Bank Doing Business / Investment Climate
Georgia consistently ranks in the top 10 globally for ease of employing workers — reflecting low labour costs, minimal dismissal restrictions, and no collective bargaining obligation. The World Bank notes this is attractive for FDI but also reflects weak worker protections. The challenge: attract quality FDI (high-skill, high-wage) not just cost-minimising relocation. (WB Georgia Investment Climate 2023)
IMF Article IV 2023
Unit labour cost growth in Georgia (3.5% real annually 2020-2023) exceeds productivity growth, creating inflationary pressure and eroding export competitiveness. IMF recommends Georgia focus on productivity-enhancing investment (skills, technology, infrastructure) rather than preserving low-cost advantage, which is unsustainable long-term. (IMF Article IV Georgia 2023)
EBRD Transition Report 2023
Georgia's labour market flexibility (easy hiring/firing, no sector wage bargaining) is valued by foreign investors but creates a race-to-the-bottom dynamic in low-skill sectors. EBRD recommends Georgia develop a productivity partnership model: tripartite agreements linking wage growth to sectoral productivity benchmarks. (EBRD Transition Report 2023)
ILO Decent Work Country Programme
Low labour costs in Georgia reflect low labour standards — particularly: no unemployment insurance, nominal minimum wage, weak collective bargaining. The DW Country Programme targets moving Georgia toward a 'high-road' competitiveness model based on skills and productivity rather than cost suppression. (ILO DWCP Georgia 2023-2026)
GILS Position Statement

Georgia's labour cost advantage is real but fragile and declining. GILS does not advocate preserving low wages as a development strategy — it is a race countries do not win against lower-income competitors. The path forward is productivity-driven wage growth: invest in skills, technology adoption, and innovation to justify higher wages. The introduction of unemployment insurance (missing entirely) would slightly increase the tax wedge but would provide the economic stability that makes Georgia a more attractive location for quality investment.

— GILS Research Position on Labour Cost and Competitiveness, September 2026
GILS Policy Recommendations
Five Priority Reforms
Recommendation 01
Introduce unemployment insurance — 0.5% payroll contribution

Georgia has no unemployment insurance — workers who lose jobs receive no wage-replacement benefit. Introduce: 0.5% employee + 0.5% employer payroll contribution (total 1% — minimal impact on labour costs); benefit: 60% of previous wage for 6 months; administered by ESDC. Would add ~GEL 60/month to average total labour cost (2.8% increase) while providing critical income security.

Estonia (unemployment insurance: 0.8% employee + 0.8% employer) · Latvia (0.2%+0.2%) · Lithuania (2.49%+1.47%)
Recommendation 02
Productivity-wage linkage — tripartite sector agreements

Rising unit labour costs without productivity growth is the core risk. Establish tripartite Sector Productivity Partnerships in 5 key sectors (manufacturing, logistics, IT, tourism, construction): annual agreements linking wage growth to sector productivity benchmarks; government facilitates; binding on participating employers. Target: 40,000 workers in productivity partnerships by 2026.

Germany (sectoral collective agreements) · Estonia (productivity commission) · ILO C98 (collective bargaining promotion)
Recommendation 03
Skills investment to justify higher wages

Low wages partly reflect low productivity reflecting low skills. GEL 80M annual increase in employer-led vocational training (ESDC co-fund model): target 20,000 workers upskilled annually in priority sectors. Within 3 years: productivity increase of 8-12% in participating firms (ILO evidence), justifying wage growth without ULC deterioration.

Germany (Kurzarbeit + upskilling) · Estonia (ESF-funded skills programme) · Georgia ESDC employer-led training (expand)
Recommendation 04
FDI quality screening — shift from cost to capability

Current FDI promotion (Invest in Georgia) emphasises low costs. Reframe: target FDI in high-value sectors (greentech, pharmaceuticals, digital services, advanced manufacturing) offering GEL 1,500+ average wages. Quality FDI incentive: additional 10% R&D tax credit for companies investing in Georgian workforce development.

Ireland (IDA quality FDI model) · Estonia (FDI skills partnership) · Georgia Invest in Georgia 2024 strategy
Recommendation 05
Real-time ULC monitoring — Geostat/NBG joint publication

No real-time unit labour cost data exists for Georgia. Geostat + NBG to publish quarterly ULC index by sector (wage growth divided by output per worker), with 60-day lag. Enables: early warning of competitiveness deterioration; sector-level policy targeting; investor information. Cost: GEL 300K setup; GEL 80K annually.

Eurostat ULC methodology · Estonia (quarterly productivity accounts) · ILO ULC database
ILO Standards — Georgia
International Compliance Status
ILO ConventionSubjectRatifiedComplianceKey Gap
C173Protection of Workers' Claims (Insolvency) Not ratifiedn/aWorkers' wage claims unsecured in insolvency; no guarantee fund
C168Employment Promotion & Unemployment Protection Not ratifiedn/aNo unemployment insurance — zero automatic stabiliser
C098Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining 1993PoorCollective bargaining coverage <5%; wage growth not linked to productivity