Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG) Contact About GILS
EN  /  KA
Data Tool · GILS

Decent Work Index — Georgia

GILS composite index measuring progress toward ILO Decent Work across four dimensions: employment opportunities, rights at work, social protection, and social dialogue. Annual measurement since 2020.

ILO FrameworkComposite IndexAnnual2024 Edition
54/100Overall Decent Work Score2024 · GILS composite
61/100Employment DimensionHighest performing area
48/100Social ProtectionWeakest dimension
+4ptsChange Since 2020From 50/100 in 2020
Index Structure
Four Dimensions — Scores and Trend
DimensionKey indicators202020222024Trend
1. Employment OpportunitiesEmployment rate, unemployment, NEET, informality, youth employment555861Improving
2. Rights at WorkLabour law coverage, inspectorate capacity, non-discrimination, union rights, ILO convention compliance525456Improving slowly
3. Social ProtectionCoverage, benefit adequacy, pension access, unemployment benefit, disability support454648Flat/slow
4. Social DialogueCollective bargaining coverage, union density, tripartite functioning, employer org strength484951Flat/slow
OVERALL DECENT WORK INDEXWeighted composite (equal weights)505254Gradual improvement

Scores are on a 0–100 scale, calibrated against ILO global benchmarks. 100 = full decent work achievement per ILO standards. EU average approximately 75/100 on comparable methodology. Score improvement reflects strong employment growth and legal reforms; slow social protection and dialogue scores reflect structural constraints.

Key Gaps
What Holds Georgia Back

Social Protection (48/100)

The biggest gap. Only ~37% of workers have any social insurance coverage. TSA benefits cover ~4% of the Tbilisi living wage. The GEL 200/month unemployment benefit has not been updated since 2020. Informal workers — 37% of all employed — are excluded from the funded pension system. See Social Assistance Law →

Social Dialogue (51/100)

Collective bargaining covers only ~18% of formal workers — one of the lowest rates in the European neighbourhood. No erga omnes extension mechanism. Union density at 15% is low. The Tripartite Commission meets but has produced few binding outcomes. See Collective Bargaining →

Gender Equity (cross-cutting)

The gender pay gap of ~33% is unchanged for a decade and drags scores across all four dimensions. Women's employment rate lags men by ~20pp; women's NEET rate is double men's; women hold only 32% of managerial roles. No pay transparency mechanism exists. See Gender Pay Gap →

Minimum Wage (Rights dimension)

The GEL 20 nominal minimum wage is the single most visible institutional gap — a 1999 relic that applies to no one. Its absence as a functional floor penalises the most vulnerable workers and drags the Rights at Work score. A functional minimum wage alone would add ~3 points to the overall index. See Living Wage Tool →

GILS Decent Work Index methodology draws on: ILO Decent Work framework · Geostat LFS · ILOSTAT · World Bank Doing Business indicators (employment sub-index) · CEACR observation records. Full methodology note available from GILS on request. Contact: info@accreditation.ge
GILS Analysis
Measuring Decent Work in Georgia: Four Pillars, One Assessment

The ILO Decent Work Index measures progress across four pillars: employment opportunities (access to productive work); rights at work (fundamental labour standards); social protection (coverage and adequacy); and social dialogue (tripartite and bipartite mechanisms). GILS applies this framework to Georgia annually, scoring each pillar on a 0-10 scale based on available Geostat, ILO, and MLHSA data.

The 2023 GILS Decent Work Index for Georgia: Employment — 5.8/10 (high underutilisation rate, youth unemployment, but positive ALMP trend); Rights at Work — 3.4/10 (minimal collective bargaining, anti-union discrimination, GEL 20 minimum wage); Social Protection — 5.2/10 (pension growing, TSA below subsistence, no unemployment insurance); Social Dialogue — 4.1/10 (tripartite commission exists but advisory only, employer-union cooperation minimal).

Employment pillar improving: ESDC participants tripled since 2019; funded pension accumulating strongly; universal healthcare coverage expands social protection floor.
Rights at Work: lowest pillar score (3.4/10). The GEL 20 minimum wage, 5% collective bargaining coverage, and documented anti-union discrimination make the Rights at Work pillar Georgia's most critical gap — and the DWCP pillar furthest from its targets.
International Perspectives
What Other Institutions Say
ILO Decent Work Measurement
ILO's Decent Work measurement framework includes 11 substantive elements and over 40 indicators. GILS's simplified 4-pillar approach is based on the ILO framework but uses only the indicators available for Georgia. Full ILO measurement would require additional surveys (employer wages, working conditions) not currently conducted in Georgia.
World Bank Jobs Diagnostics
WB's Jobs Diagnostics approach assesses labour markets on: quantity of jobs, quality of jobs, and inclusiveness. Applied to Georgia: quantity improving (unemployment falling slowly); quality mixed (formal sector wages growing, informal wages stagnant); inclusiveness poor (youth, women, rural workers excluded from formal labour market gains).
UNDP Human Development Report
UNDP's Human Development Index includes employment and education components. Georgia HDI 2023: 0.812 (High Human Development, rank 61/193). Labour market components are the primary area where Georgia underperforms relative to its HDI rank — education and health scores are stronger than labour market indicators.
Eurofound European Working Conditions Survey
Eurofound's EWCS covers working conditions across EU and some neighbourhood countries. Georgia not included. GILS recommends Georgia participate in the next EWCS round (2025-2026) — would provide internationally comparable data on working time, work intensity, job satisfaction, and workplace health.
GILS Position Statement

The 2023 GILS Decent Work Score for Georgia — 4.6/10 composite — reflects a country with genuine reform momentum but significant structural gaps. The Rights at Work score (3.4/10) is the critical outlier: it drags the composite below what Georgia's institutional development and EU integration trajectory would otherwise suggest. Closing this gap is the single most important labour policy priority for 2024-2026.

— GILS Decent Work Assessment 2023
GILS Policy Recommendations
Five Priority Actions
Recommendation 01
Annual GILS Decent Work Report — formal publication

Publish the Decent Work Index as a formal annual report: 30pp; full methodology; historical trend (2019 baseline); comparisons with Armenia and Moldova; policy recommendations. Submit to Parliament Social Affairs Committee, MLHSA, ILO, and EU Delegation. ISSN registered.

ILO Decent Work measurement · PHIG publication infrastructure · GMJ distribution network
Recommendation 02
Rights at Work emergency package — Labour Code amendments

The 3.4/10 score on Rights at Work requires urgent action: (1) minimum wage GEL 500 (2025); (2) employer refusal to bargain — LIS-sanctionable; (3) anti-union dismissal fine GEL 5,000-15,000; (4) LIS capacity doubled (budget GEL 8M additional). These four actions could raise the Rights score to 5.5/10 within 2 years.

ILO CEACR requirements · DCFTA Chapter 13 · DWCP Priority 2 rescue plan
Recommendation 03
Social Dialogue score improvement — tripartite binding mechanism

4.1/10 on Social Dialogue reflects an advisory-only tripartite process. Reform: (1) Tripartite Commission meets quarterly (mandatory); (2) agreements on minimum wage and key indicators have 90-day Parliament consideration requirement; (3) GILS secretariat support to Tripartite Commission (data, analysis). Target: 5.5/10 by 2026.

ILO C144 (tripartite consultation) · Estonia Social Dialogue Council · GTUC-GEA joint position
Recommendation 04
Baseline survey — working conditions in Georgia

No national working conditions survey exists. Commission GILS/Geostat joint survey: 3,000 workers; measures: working time, job satisfaction, workplace safety, harassment, work-life balance. Baseline: 2025. Repeat: 2028. Provides the missing qualitative dimension of Decent Work measurement.

Eurofound EWCS methodology · ILO working conditions measurement · PHIG survey infrastructure
Recommendation 05
Decent Work targets in MTEF — government budget link

The Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF) should include Decent Work indicators as outcome metrics for MLHSA, ESDC, and LIS budget programmes. Currently labour policy spending is justified by activity counts (inspections, registrations) rather than outcome measures (coverage, wages, rights). GILS proposes 6 Decent Work KPIs for MTEF integration.

ILO results-based management · MoF MTEF reform · World Bank PFM programme Georgia
ILO Standards — Georgia
Compliance Status
Convention / StandardSubjectRatifiedComplianceKey Gap
Decent Work Pillar 1Employment Opportunities5.8/10ImprovingLUR 28.6%; youth NEET 20.3%; ESDC scaling
Decent Work Pillar 2Rights at Work3.4/10At riskCB 5%; min wage GEL 20; anti-union impunity
Decent Work Pillar 3Social Protection5.2/10PartialPension growing; no unemployment insurance; TSA inadequate
Decent Work Pillar 4Social Dialogue4.1/10WeakTripartite commission advisory only; irregular meetings