Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG) Contact About GILS
EN  /  KA
Data Tool · GILS

Informal Economy — Georgia

The scale, sectors, and policy dimensions of informal employment in Georgia — covering approximately 37% of all workers. Data from Geostat Labour Force Survey and ILOSTAT. Updated quarterly.

Geostat LFSILOSTATQ1 2026
~37%Informal Employment Share2024 Geostat LFS estimate
~98%Agricultural InformalitySubsistence + smallholder sector
~700,000Informal WorkersEstimated total count
0%Informal Worker Pension CoverageNo funded pension access
Data
Key Indicators
Indicator / SegmentValueNotes
Agriculture (smallholder/subsistence)~98% informal~700,000 workers; predominantly elderly and female
Domestic work~85% informal~30,000 estimated; mostly female
Construction (subcontracted)~45% informalParticularly subcontracted trades
Small retail and street trade~60% informalParticularly outside Tbilisi
Accommodation and food (small operators)~35% informalGuesthouses, family restaurants
Transport (taxi/minibus)~30% informalApp-based gig work growing
Manufacturing (small workshops)~22% informalDeclining with registration incentives
National average (all sectors)~37% informalDown from ~45% in 2015

Source: Geostat Labour Force Survey; ILOSTAT. All figures refer to latest available period unless stated.

Analysis
Policy Context

Informality in Georgia is falling slowly — from ~45% in 2015 to ~37% in 2024 — driven by pension system incentives (formal employees accumulate funded pension contributions since 2019) and expanded tax registration of small businesses. However, agriculture remains overwhelmingly informal, and new forms of platform/gig work are creating a new category of workers outside formal protection. Informal workers are excluded from: funded pension accumulation, unemployment benefit, OSH legal protections in practice, and most social insurance. The social cost is concentrated in old age (no pension) and in healthcare (reliance on UHC without supplemental coverage). See Working Poverty → and Funded Pension Law →

See Also
Related Tools and Pages

Working Poverty Georgia →  ·  Law Funded Pension →  ·  Law Employment Assistance →  ·  Observatory →

Geostat LFS · ILOSTAT · Labour Market Observatory →
Contact: info@accreditation.ge
GILS Analysis
The Scale and Structure of Georgia's Informal Economy

Georgia's informal economy is large and structurally embedded. ILO estimates place informal employment at approximately 56-58% of total employment — meaning more than half of Georgia's workforce lacks formal contracts, social security coverage, and labour rights protections. This is among the highest informality rates in the EU neighbourhood, significantly above Armenia (44%) and comparable to Azerbaijan and Turkey.

Informality is concentrated in: subsistence and small-scale agriculture (the largest sector — approximately 360,000 informal "self-employed"); construction (estimated 65% informal employment rate); domestic work; small retail trade; and hospitality. Urban informal employment is primarily in construction and services; rural informal employment is dominated by subsistence farming.

Formalisation progress: Formal employment has grown from 38% to 44% of total employment since 2014, driven by growth in IT, finance, and professional services. The LIS (Labour Inspection Service) has increased inspections from 1,200 (2018) to 4,800 (2023) with specific focus on construction informality. MLHSA introduced a simplified business registration for micro-enterprises in 2020.
Structural persistence: Much informality in Georgia is not evasion of taxes — it is simply the absence of formal employment structures in sectors where formalisation is costly relative to wages. Agricultural informality cannot be reduced by inspection and penalty alone — it requires economic transformation. The LIS can reach urban construction informality; it cannot reach subsistence farming households.
International Perspectives
What Other Institutions Say
ILO / OECD Informality Task Force
Georgia's 56% informality rate places it in the 'high informality' category alongside middle-income countries in Latin America and Sub-Saharan Africa. The ILO's Transition from the Informal to the Formal Economy Recommendation (R204, 2015) identifies: simplified registration, social protection extension, and enforcement as the three levers. Georgia has made progress on registration but social protection extension remains incomplete. (ILO R204 Georgia Progress Review 2023)
Georgian Tax Authority (RS)
Tax Authority has made progress on formalisation through: electronic cash register requirements (2019); simplified tax regime for micro-business (2% turnover); and cross-referencing employment records with social insurance contributions. However, estimated GEL 2.8B in uncollected social contributions annually from informal employment remains a significant fiscal loss. (RS Annual Report 2023)
Transparency International Georgia
Informality in construction is particularly acute — and particularly dangerous. An estimated 65% of construction workers lack formal contracts, meaning they have no OSH protections, no workers' compensation if injured, and no recourse if wages are withheld. Construction accident rates are the highest of any sector. Formalisation of construction employment is both a labour rights and an OSH imperative. (TI Georgia Labour Rights Report 2023)
EBRD Georgia Country Assessment
High informality is a barrier to productivity growth. Informal firms invest less, train workers less, and have lower access to credit. The transition from informal to formal enterprise is associated with a 30-40% productivity uplift. Formalisation incentives (tax concessions, access to finance, simplified compliance) have better evidence than enforcement alone for enterprise-level informality. (EBRD Transition Report Georgia 2023)
GILS Position Statement

Georgia's 56% informality rate is not primarily a compliance failure — it is a structural economic feature reflecting the large subsistence agricultural sector, the cost of formality relative to wages in low-productivity sectors, and inadequate social protection incentives that would make formal registration attractive to workers. GILS opposes a purely enforcement-led response: inspection of subsistence farmers is unworkable and counterproductive. The priority is to make formality rational and attractive — through simplified registration, meaningful social protection for formal workers, and economic transformation of the agricultural sector.

— GILS Research Position on Informal Economy Transition, September 2026
GILS Policy Recommendations
Five Approaches to Formalisation
Recommendation 01
Extend social protection to informal workers — ILO R204

Formalisation is unattractive if formal status provides only obligations (tax, social contributions) without proportionate benefits. Extend: (1) basic health insurance to informal workers earning below median (currently only TSA households and pensioners covered universally); (2) pension accumulation for informal workers through simplified flat-rate option (GEL 30+GEL 20 state match/month); (3) OSH protections applying to all workplaces regardless of formality. Makes formal registration rational.

ILO Recommendation 204 (2015) · Moldova (informal worker health insurance) · Georgia pension informal inclusion (2024)
Recommendation 02
Construction sector — mandatory electronic payroll

Construction has 65% informality and highest accident rates. From 2026: all construction contracts above GEL 50,000 require electronic payroll — worker wages paid to registered bank account, contributions deducted at source. LIS inspectors verify electronically. Applies to: direct employer and all sub-contractors. Non-compliance: construction permit revoked. Estimated: 40,000 new formal construction registrations within 2 years.

Ukraine (construction e-payroll 2021) · Moldova (construction formality campaign) · Georgia LIS capacity (needs scaling)
Recommendation 03
Micro-enterprise formalisation incentive — 3-year tax holiday

Businesses with turnover below GEL 500,000 registering as formal employers for first time receive: 3-year 50% reduction in employer social contribution (2% vs 4%); simplified quarterly contribution reporting (not monthly); no penalty for prior informality. Cost: GEL 60M/year estimated; expected revenue gain from newly formal micro-enterprises within 5 years: GEL 180M.

Georgia (existing micro-business simplification — extend it) · Romania (micro-enterprise tax reform) · Moldova (simplified employer regime)
Recommendation 04
Agricultural cooperatives — path to formalisation

Subsistence farmers cannot individually formalise viably — individually, farming GEL 100/month, the administrative cost of formal registration exceeds the benefit. Cooperative model: 5+ farmers register jointly as a cooperative; cooperative employs members; contributions paid collectively; aggregate tax treatment. MoA cooperative development office provides registration support. Target: 5,000 cooperative formal agricultural jobs by 2027.

Georgia (cooperative development programme — expand) · Moldova (agricultural cooperative model) · ILO cooperative promotion R193
Recommendation 05
Formalisation awareness campaign — RS and MLHSA joint

Many small employers and workers are informally employed not from deliberate evasion but from unfamiliarity with registration procedures and benefits. RS + MLHSA joint outreach: (1) online formalisation guide in Georgian, Armenian, and Russian; (2) free one-hour formalisation consultation at all ESDC offices; (3) mobile registration units visiting markets and construction sites quarterly. Target: 25,000 new formal registrations annually from campaign.

ILO formalisation awareness campaigns · Moldova (ODIMM formalisation programme) · RS Georgia (e-service portal expansion)
ILO Standards — Georgia
International Compliance Status
ILO ConventionSubjectRatifiedComplianceKey Gap
R204Transition to Formal Economy (Recommendation) 2015PartialSocial protection extension incomplete; construction enforcement weak
C189Domestic Workers Not ratifiedn/aDomestic workers — overwhelmingly informal — have no specific protection
C177Home Work Not ratifiedn/aHome workers invisible to labour inspection