Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG)ContactAbout GILS
EN
Home / About GILS
Research
Informal Economy
labour.edu.ge · Independent Labour Research
Topic

Informal Economy

Work without formal contracts, social protection or legal coverage — who does it, where, and why it persists.

Last updated: 3 October 2026

Overview

A large share of work in Georgia is informal — without a written contract, social insurance or effective legal protection. Informality is highest in agriculture, construction and micro-enterprises, among men, among the least educated, and among the very young and older workers. About a third of informal jobs are inside formal-sector firms rather than in unregistered businesses.

Key figures

37.1%

Share of all employment that is informal, 2022

Pignatti (2026), ILO Working Paper 159

28.3%

Informal employment outside agriculture, 2025

Geostat

42.9% · 29.8%

Informality rate among men and women, 2022

Pignatti (2026)

27%

Share of informal jobs inside formal-sector firms

Pignatti (2026)

Trend outside agriculture

Informal employment outside agriculture, % of non-agricultural employmentInformal employment outside agriculture, % of non-agricultural employment01020304031.7202028.8202128.4202227.6202329.1202428.32025Source: Geostat, Labour Force Survey.
Informal employment outside agriculture, 2025 (%)
GroupRate
Women23.3
Men32.6
Urban26.1
Rural33.0
Total28.3

Source: Geostat. Geostat's series covers non-agricultural employment; the ILO estimate (37.1%) covers all employment.

Georgia and the region

Informal employment, ILO harmonised basis (% of total employment)
CountryRate (year)
Georgia55.6 (2020)
Moldova54.6 (2019)
Türkiye35.2 (2019)

Source: ILOSTAT. The harmonised measure includes subsistence agriculture and is therefore much higher than the 37.1% estimated for 2022 in ILO Working Paper 159, which applies the current statistical standards. EU countries do not report a comparable indicator.

Across the EU, work without a contract is measured instead through surveys of undeclared work; the concepts differ, so Georgia's informality rate cannot be compared directly with EU figures.

Who works informally

  • 69% of informal employment is in the informal sector (25.7% of total employment); 27% is in formal-sector firms (10.1% of total employment); 1.3% of total employment is in the household sector (Pignatti, 2026).
  • Informality follows a U-shape with age: almost all employed very young people work informally; the rate is lowest, at 21%, around age 25, and rises again with age (Pignatti, 2026).
  • Around 80% of workers with primary education are informally employed, compared with less than 20% of those with tertiary education (Pignatti, 2026).
  • Informal workers earn substantially less, work fewer hours on average but more often at atypical times (Pignatti, 2026).
  • An estimated 18,000 people worked as domestic workers in 2019 — about 1.1% of employment — largely outside the Labour Code's practical reach (ISET Policy Institute and UN Women, 2021).

Legal and policy framework

  • Labour Code of Georgia — applies to employment relationships; in practice, unwritten and disguised relationships are hard to enforce.
  • Tax Code — micro and small business regimes — see the GILS analysis of the small-business tax cliff.
  • Labour Inspection Service — limited practical reach into the informal economy (US Department of State, 2025; Social Justice Center et al., 2023).
  • ILO Recommendation No. 204 (2015) — on the transition from the informal to the formal economy.

Research map

  • ILO (2026) — Pignatti, Recent trends on informal employment in Georgia, Working Paper 159. ILO
  • Geostat — share of informal employment in non-agricultural employment. Data
  • ISET Policy Institute and UN Women (2021) — regulatory impact assessment of ILO Convention No. 189 on domestic workers. iset-pi.ge
  • UN Women (2024) — Invisible Hands: formalisation of domestic work in Georgia. unwomen.org
  • Social Justice Center (2021) — informal and non-standard employment in Georgia (cited in Social Justice Center et al., 2023).
  • Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung (2023) — online platforms and platform work in Georgia. fes.de

Data gaps

  • Geostat's official series covers non-agricultural employment only; the most recent estimate for all employment is the ILO figure for 2022.
  • Earnings and working conditions in informal jobs are measured only occasionally.
  • Platform work is not separately identified in official statistics.

GILS analyses on this topic

Global Wire · 5 Oct 2026Flood-Driven Employment Shocks in Nepal: Supply-Chain and Informal-Work Lessons for GeorgiaAn ILO preliminary assessment of the 2026 Nepal floods identifies labour-market vulnerabilities that extend well beyond disaster zones, offering transferable insights for economies with high informality and remittance…GILS Analysis · 2 Oct 2026Georgia’s Small-Business Tax Cliff: How Micro and Small Business Regimes Can Discourage the First Formal HireGeorgia's special tax regimes for micro and small businesses are among the most generous in the region: zero tax on turnover below GEL 30,000, and 1% on turnover…GILS Analysis · 23 Sep 202637% of Georgia’s Workers Are Informally Employed: Who They Are, Where They Work, and Why Informality PersistsAccording to the ILO's most recent analysis of Georgian Labour Force Survey data, 37.1% of employed people in Georgia worked informally in 2022. The profile that emerges is…Georgia Wire · 16 Aug 2026Georgia Wire: Domestic Workers Remain Outside the Labour Code — What the Evidence Shows as the ILO Raises the IssueDomestic workers — nannies, cleaners, carers and cooks working in private homes — remain outside the effective protection of Georgia's Labour Code. The best available estimate puts their…Global Wire · 13 Aug 2026The EU Platform Work Directive: What a Presumption of Employment Would Mean for Georgia’s CouriersThe EU's Platform Work Directive, adopted in October 2024, introduces a legal presumption that platform workers are employees when a platform directs and controls their work, and new…

Sources for this page

Figures are from the GILS Evidence Register and the official sources shown. GILS is independent of government, trade unions, employers' organisations and the ILO.