How WHO frames safety and health at work — as part of the health system, with prevention, health services and health promotion — with the WHO and ILO figures for Georgia, its region and the world.
Last updated: 3 October 2026
The ILO treats safety and health at work as a matter of labour standards and inspection; WHO treats workers' health as public health and a function of the health system. WHO addresses all determinants of workers' health — occupational hazards, social and individual factors, and access to health services — and asks health systems to respond to the needs of working people (WHO). Both perspectives are needed. In Georgia the labour side is carried by the Labour Inspection Service, while the health side — occupational health services, surveillance of work-related disease, health promotion at work — has no visible owner in published strategies. GILS, as a programme of a public health institute, brings this second perspective. Every figure on this page carries its source.
Work-related deaths worldwide in 2016, from 19 occupational risk factors; 81% from non-communicable disease
WHO and ILO (2021)
Deaths in 2016 from stroke and heart disease attributable to working 55 hours or more a week — the largest single occupational risk factor
WHO and ILO (2021)
People working 55 hours or more a week in 2016 (8.9% of the world population)
WHO/ILO Joint Estimates
Workers worldwide with access to specialised occupational health services
WHO
Fatal occupational injuries per 100,000 workers in Georgia, 2024 (3.0 in 2021)
ILOSTAT, reported by Georgia
Georgia's status in WHO's 2023 indicator on a national OSH policy for health workers (not reported); Armenia: Yes
WHO Global Health Observatory
The WHO/ILO Joint Estimates attribute 1.9 million deaths in 2016 to 19 occupational risk factors: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 450,000, stroke 400,000, ischaemic heart disease 350,000, and injuries 360,000 (19%); work-related deaths per population fell by 14% between 2000 and 2016, but deaths from heart disease and stroke linked to long hours rose by 41% and 19% (WHO and ILO, 2021). Working 55 or more hours a week carries an estimated 35% higher risk of stroke and 17% higher risk of death from ischaemic heart disease than a 35–40-hour week; 72% of these deaths are among men (WHO and ILO, 2021).
By WHO region, the European Region — Georgia's group — has the lowest exposure: 3.5% of the population worked 55 or more hours a week in 2016, down from 4.6% in 2000, and long hours account for 1.4% of ischaemic heart disease deaths and 2.5% of stroke deaths in the region, against 7.2% and 12.8% in South-East Asia (Pega et al., 2021, supplementary tables). Country values for Georgia are published in the WHO/ILO country tables and will be added here when GILS has verified them against the WHO data application.
WHO's earlier comparative risk assessment (2004 estimates, Global Health Observatory) gave 17.7 occupational deaths per 100,000 for the low- and middle-income countries of the European Region against 11.8 in high-income countries; those figures are superseded by the 2016 Joint Estimates and are cited here only for the historical record.
The ILO publishes country-reported occupational injury rates. Georgia reported 2.35 fatal injuries per 100,000 workers in 2024, down from 3.0 in 2021, and 18.3 non-fatal injuries per 100,000 — 33 deaths and 257 injuries in 2024 (ILOSTAT). Among its neighbours, Azerbaijan reported 4.0 (2023), Armenia 4.2 (2020), Moldova 4.3 (2024), Russia 5.0 (2024), Ukraine 7.6 (2021) and Türkiye 11.5 (2024); the EU-27 standardised rate was 2.1 in 2024 (Eurostat).
Non-fatal rates are not comparable across countries: Türkiye reports 4,409 per 100,000 through its insurance system, Georgia 18 through inspection reports. Low non-fatal rates usually indicate under-reporting, not safety; WHO's and the ILO's guidance on recording (ILO Protocol of 2002) addresses exactly this.
| Instrument | Content |
|---|---|
| Global Strategy on Occupational Health for All (WHA49.12, 1996) | Occupational health as a right and as part of health for all |
| Global Plan of Action on Workers' Health 2008–2017 (WHA60.26, 2007) | Five objectives: national policy instruments; protection and promotion of health at the workplace; access to occupational health services; evidence for action; workers' health in other policies; national programmes for the occupational health of health workers |
| WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2021–) | Deaths and disability attributable to occupational risk factors, by country |
| WHO–ILO Global Framework for National Occupational Health Programmes for Health Workers (2010) and Caring for those who care (2022) | Programmes for health workers at national, subnational and facility level |
| WHO guidelines on mental health at work (2022); ICD-11 burn-out (QD85, 2019) | Organisational interventions, manager training, support for workers |
| WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model (2010) | Physical work environment; psychosocial environment; personal health resources; enterprise community involvement |
| WHO Global Health Observatory | Occupational risk factor burden by region; national OSH policy for health workers by country (2023) |
| Country | Status |
|---|---|
| Georgia | Unknown (not reported) |
| Armenia | Yes |
| Azerbaijan | Unknown |
| Türkiye | Unknown |
| Moldova | No policy |
| Ukraine | Unknown |
| Russian Federation | Unknown |
| Germany · France · United Kingdom · Croatia · Lithuania · Portugal | Yes |
| Switzerland · North Macedonia | Yes, partially |
| Finland · Denmark · Bulgaria · Latvia · Slovakia · Albania · Serbia | No policy |
Source: WHO Global Health Observatory, OHS_POLICYSTATUS (2023). Worldwide: 28 countries Yes, 13 partially, 36 No policy, 107 Unknown. "Unknown" means the country did not report.
WHO reports that 8–38% of health workers suffer physical violence at some point in their careers and that up to 62% experience some form of workplace violence (WHO); the WHO/ILO guide makes immunisation, incident reporting and a facility focal point core elements of a programme (WHO and ILO, 2022). Georgia's non-reporting on the 2023 indicator is itself a finding: the health sector has not stated whether such a policy exists. See Health workers.
| WHO objective | Georgia | Source |
|---|---|---|
| 1. National policy instruments on workers' health | An occupational safety law (2019) and inspection exist on the labour side; no national policy or programme on workers' health led by the health sector was found in published sources; WHO's 2023 health-worker policy indicator: not reported | ETF–Eurofound (2024); WHO GHO (2023); GILS review |
| 2. Protect and promote health at the workplace | Employers' duties under the 2019 law; no national workplace health promotion programme found | GILS review |
| 3. Access to occupational health services | No obligation to provide occupational health services; Convention No. 161 not ratified; occupational health not an identifiable component of state health programmes in published sources | ILO NORMLEX; GILS review |
| 4. Evidence for action | Accident counts and rates reported to the ILO through 2024; no occupational disease data; no working-conditions survey | ILOSTAT; see Accidents and deaths |
| 5. Workers' health in other policies | EU approximation (Association Agreement) and the ILO Decent Work Country Programme (2024) are the vehicles; health-sector strategies do not reference workers' health in published sources | GILS review |
"GILS review" indicates that GILS searched published Georgian strategies, laws and programme descriptions and found no provision; it does not assert that none exists.
The Labour Code sets a 40-hour week, 48 hours for specified sectors, limits overtime by agreement and defines night work as 22:00–06:00 (ETF–Eurofound, 2024). Georgia's exposure to long working hours is not published by Geostat in the form WHO uses (share of employed working 55 hours or more a week). The WHO/ILO estimates show that this exposure, not accidents, carries the largest work-related disease burden worldwide; measuring it in Georgia would be a first step the health sector could take with existing Labour Force Survey data. See the dictionary entries on working time and overtime.
Figures are from the GILS Evidence Register and the official sources shown. GILS is independent of government, trade unions, employers' organisations and the ILO.
Labour Inspection in Georgia Five Years After the Full Mandate: More Inspections, an Unratified Convention — and the Evidence Still MissingGeorgia's Labour Inspection Service has had a full mandate only since 2021. Inspections have grown fast, but Convention No. 81 is still unratified, staffing data are out of…
Georgia Wire: Parliament Hears the Labour Inspection Service’s 2025 Report — Five Years After the Full MandateParliament's Economic Policy Committee has heard the Labour Inspection Service's report for 2025: 7,111 inspections, 3,709 facilities inspected for the first time, and a reported 46% fall in…
Georgia Has Not Ratified the ILO’s Fundamental Safety Conventions: Why C155 and C187 MatterIn 2022 the International Labour Conference made a safe and healthy working environment a fundamental principle and right at work, raising the ILO's two framework conventions on occupational…
Georgia Wire: 32 Workplace Deaths in 2025, Two-Thirds in Construction — What the Labour Inspection Data ShowThe Labour Inspection Service recorded 32 workplace deaths and 179 injuries in 2025, and reported a 46% fall in fatal accidents compared with the previous year. Construction accounted…