Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG)ContactAbout GILS
EN
Home / About GILS
Research
Workers' health: the public health perspective
labour.edu.ge · Independent Labour Research
Occupational Safety & Health · Framework

Workers' health: the public health perspective

How WHO frames safety and health at work — as part of the health system, with prevention, health services and health promotion — with the WHO and ILO figures for Georgia, its region and the world.

Last updated: 3 October 2026

FrameworkDataHazardsSectorsPeopleHealth workersHub

Overview

The ILO treats safety and health at work as a matter of labour standards and inspection; WHO treats workers' health as public health and a function of the health system. WHO addresses all determinants of workers' health — occupational hazards, social and individual factors, and access to health services — and asks health systems to respond to the needs of working people (WHO). Both perspectives are needed. In Georgia the labour side is carried by the Labour Inspection Service, while the health side — occupational health services, surveillance of work-related disease, health promotion at work — has no visible owner in published strategies. GILS, as a programme of a public health institute, brings this second perspective. Every figure on this page carries its source.

Key figures

1.9 million

Work-related deaths worldwide in 2016, from 19 occupational risk factors; 81% from non-communicable disease

WHO and ILO (2021)

745,000

Deaths in 2016 from stroke and heart disease attributable to working 55 hours or more a week — the largest single occupational risk factor

WHO and ILO (2021)

488 million

People working 55 hours or more a week in 2016 (8.9% of the world population)

WHO/ILO Joint Estimates

15%

Workers worldwide with access to specialised occupational health services

WHO

2.35

Fatal occupational injuries per 100,000 workers in Georgia, 2024 (3.0 in 2021)

ILOSTAT, reported by Georgia

Unknown

Georgia's status in WHO's 2023 indicator on a national OSH policy for health workers (not reported); Armenia: Yes

WHO Global Health Observatory

The burden of work-related disease: what WHO and the ILO estimate

The WHO/ILO Joint Estimates attribute 1.9 million deaths in 2016 to 19 occupational risk factors: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 450,000, stroke 400,000, ischaemic heart disease 350,000, and injuries 360,000 (19%); work-related deaths per population fell by 14% between 2000 and 2016, but deaths from heart disease and stroke linked to long hours rose by 41% and 19% (WHO and ILO, 2021). Working 55 or more hours a week carries an estimated 35% higher risk of stroke and 17% higher risk of death from ischaemic heart disease than a 35–40-hour week; 72% of these deaths are among men (WHO and ILO, 2021).

By WHO region, the European Region — Georgia's group — has the lowest exposure: 3.5% of the population worked 55 or more hours a week in 2016, down from 4.6% in 2000, and long hours account for 1.4% of ischaemic heart disease deaths and 2.5% of stroke deaths in the region, against 7.2% and 12.8% in South-East Asia (Pega et al., 2021, supplementary tables). Country values for Georgia are published in the WHO/ILO country tables and will be added here when GILS has verified them against the WHO data application.

Share of the population working 55+ hours a week, 2016 (WHO/ILO Joint Estimates)Share of the population working 55+ hours a week, 2016 (WHO/ILO Joint Estimates)03.5710.5143.5%Europe6.4%Americas8.4%Western Pacific11.4%Africa11.4%Eastern Mediterranean11.7%South-East AsiaSource: WHO/ILO Joint Estimates, Pega et al. (2021), Table S6; WHO regions.
Share of deaths from heart disease and stroke attributable to long working hours, 2016 (%)Share of deaths from heart disease and stroke attributable to long working hours, 2016 (%)03.5710.5141.42.5Europe2.34.2Americas2.76.0Western Pacific3.36.3Africa5.59.5Eastern Mediterranean7.212.8South-East AsiaIschaemic heart diseaseStrokeSource: WHO/ILO Joint Estimates, Pega et al. (2021), Tables S8 and S10 (population-attributable fractions, deaths).

WHO's earlier comparative risk assessment (2004 estimates, Global Health Observatory) gave 17.7 occupational deaths per 100,000 for the low- and middle-income countries of the European Region against 11.8 in high-income countries; those figures are superseded by the 2016 Joint Estimates and are cited here only for the historical record.

Georgia and the region: fatal injuries

The ILO publishes country-reported occupational injury rates. Georgia reported 2.35 fatal injuries per 100,000 workers in 2024, down from 3.0 in 2021, and 18.3 non-fatal injuries per 100,000 — 33 deaths and 257 injuries in 2024 (ILOSTAT). Among its neighbours, Azerbaijan reported 4.0 (2023), Armenia 4.2 (2020), Moldova 4.3 (2024), Russia 5.0 (2024), Ukraine 7.6 (2021) and Türkiye 11.5 (2024); the EU-27 standardised rate was 2.1 in 2024 (Eurostat).

Fatal occupational injuries per 100,000 workers, latest yearFatal occupational injuries per 100,000 workers, latest year03.26.59.8132.4Georgia 20244.0Azerbaijan 20234.2Armenia 20204.3Moldova 20245.0Russia 20247.6Ukraine 202111.5Türkiye 20242.1EU-27 2024 (standardised)ILOSTAT country-reported rates; EU-27 is a Eurostat standardised rate on a different basis — not directly comparable.
Georgia: fatal occupational injuries per 100,000 workers, 2021–2024Georgia: fatal occupational injuries per 100,000 workers, 2021–202400.91.82.63.53.0020212.7320222.5520232.352024Source: ILOSTAT (INJ_FATL_ECO_RT), reported by Georgia.

Non-fatal rates are not comparable across countries: Türkiye reports 4,409 per 100,000 through its insurance system, Georgia 18 through inspection reports. Low non-fatal rates usually indicate under-reporting, not safety; WHO's and the ILO's guidance on recording (ILO Protocol of 2002) addresses exactly this.

The WHO framework

Instruments
InstrumentContent
Global Strategy on Occupational Health for All (WHA49.12, 1996)Occupational health as a right and as part of health for all
Global Plan of Action on Workers' Health 2008–2017 (WHA60.26, 2007)Five objectives: national policy instruments; protection and promotion of health at the workplace; access to occupational health services; evidence for action; workers' health in other policies; national programmes for the occupational health of health workers
WHO/ILO Joint Estimates of the Work-related Burden of Disease and Injury (2021–)Deaths and disability attributable to occupational risk factors, by country
WHO–ILO Global Framework for National Occupational Health Programmes for Health Workers (2010) and Caring for those who care (2022)Programmes for health workers at national, subnational and facility level
WHO guidelines on mental health at work (2022); ICD-11 burn-out (QD85, 2019)Organisational interventions, manager training, support for workers
WHO Healthy Workplace Framework and Model (2010)Physical work environment; psychosocial environment; personal health resources; enterprise community involvement
WHO Global Health ObservatoryOccupational risk factor burden by region; national OSH policy for health workers by country (2023)

Health workers: WHO's 2023 country indicator

Existence of national policy instruments for OSH of health workers, 2023
CountryStatus
GeorgiaUnknown (not reported)
ArmeniaYes
AzerbaijanUnknown
TürkiyeUnknown
MoldovaNo policy
UkraineUnknown
Russian FederationUnknown
Germany · France · United Kingdom · Croatia · Lithuania · PortugalYes
Switzerland · North MacedoniaYes, partially
Finland · Denmark · Bulgaria · Latvia · Slovakia · Albania · SerbiaNo policy

Source: WHO Global Health Observatory, OHS_POLICYSTATUS (2023). Worldwide: 28 countries Yes, 13 partially, 36 No policy, 107 Unknown. "Unknown" means the country did not report.

WHO reports that 8–38% of health workers suffer physical violence at some point in their careers and that up to 62% experience some form of workplace violence (WHO); the WHO/ILO guide makes immunisation, incident reporting and a facility focal point core elements of a programme (WHO and ILO, 2022). Georgia's non-reporting on the 2023 indicator is itself a finding: the health sector has not stated whether such a policy exists. See Health workers.

The five objectives applied to Georgia

WHO objectiveGeorgiaSource
1. National policy instruments on workers' healthAn occupational safety law (2019) and inspection exist on the labour side; no national policy or programme on workers' health led by the health sector was found in published sources; WHO's 2023 health-worker policy indicator: not reportedETF–Eurofound (2024); WHO GHO (2023); GILS review
2. Protect and promote health at the workplaceEmployers' duties under the 2019 law; no national workplace health promotion programme foundGILS review
3. Access to occupational health servicesNo obligation to provide occupational health services; Convention No. 161 not ratified; occupational health not an identifiable component of state health programmes in published sourcesILO NORMLEX; GILS review
4. Evidence for actionAccident counts and rates reported to the ILO through 2024; no occupational disease data; no working-conditions surveyILOSTAT; see Accidents and deaths
5. Workers' health in other policiesEU approximation (Association Agreement) and the ILO Decent Work Country Programme (2024) are the vehicles; health-sector strategies do not reference workers' health in published sourcesGILS review

"GILS review" indicates that GILS searched published Georgian strategies, laws and programme descriptions and found no provision; it does not assert that none exists.

Long working hours in Georgia

The Labour Code sets a 40-hour week, 48 hours for specified sectors, limits overtime by agreement and defines night work as 22:00–06:00 (ETF–Eurofound, 2024). Georgia's exposure to long working hours is not published by Geostat in the form WHO uses (share of employed working 55 hours or more a week). The WHO/ILO estimates show that this exposure, not accidents, carries the largest work-related disease burden worldwide; measuring it in Georgia would be a first step the health sector could take with existing Labour Force Survey data. See the dictionary entries on working time and overtime.

Where the two perspectives meet

  • Recording and surveillance: the ILO Protocol of 2002 and WHO's health information systems point to the same gap — occupational disease is invisible in Georgia, while injury reporting to the ILO now runs to 2024.
  • Occupational health services: ILO Convention No. 161 and WHO's call for basic occupational health services through primary health care describe the same missing service.
  • Psychosocial risk: the ILO's 2026 World Day theme and WHO's mental health at work guidelines converge on work organisation as a health determinant.
  • Health workers: the WHO–ILO joint framework and guide are the reference for the health sector as an employer, and WHO's 2023 indicator is the reporting line Georgia has not yet used.

Sources

  • WHO and ILO (2021). Almost 2 million people die from work-related causes each year (Joint Estimates monitoring report). www.who.int
  • WHO and ILO (2021). Long working hours increasing deaths from heart disease and stroke. www.who.int
  • Pega, F. et al. (2021). Global, regional, and national burdens of ischemic heart disease and stroke attributable to long working hours, 194 countries, 2000–2016. Environment International. stacks.cdc.gov
  • Pega, F. et al. (2021). Supplementary tables S6, S8, S10 (WHO/ILO Joint Estimates by WHO region). Environment International. www.sciencedirect.com
  • WHO Global Health Observatory. Occupational risk factors (2004 estimates), superseded. ghoapi.azureedge.net
  • WHO Global Health Observatory. Existence of national policy instruments for OSH for health workers (2023). www.who.int
  • ILOSTAT. Safety and health at work: fatal and non-fatal occupational injuries (INJ_FATL_ECO_RT, INJ_NFTL_ECO_RT, INJ_FATL_ECO_NB, INJ_NFTL_ECO_NB). ilostat.ilo.org
  • Eurostat. Fatal accidents at work (hsw_n2_02). ec.europa.eu
  • World Health Assembly (2007). Workers' health: global plan of action (WHA60.26). ftp.cdc.gov
  • WHO. Occupational health (access to occupational health services). www.who.int
  • WHO–ILO (2010). Global Framework for National Occupational Health Programmes for Health Workers. www.who.int
  • WHO and ILO (2022). Caring for those who care. www.who.int
  • WHO. Preventing violence against health workers. www.who.int
  • WHO (2019). Burn-out an "occupational phenomenon". www.who.int
  • ETF–Eurofound (2024). Working life in Georgia. www.etf.europa.eu

Figures are from the GILS Evidence Register and the official sources shown. GILS is independent of government, trade unions, employers' organisations and the ILO.

GILS analyses on this topic

Operated by the Public Health Institute of Georgia (PHIG) · non-profit, ID 404407815 · 3 Betlemi Rise, Tbilisi 0105, Georgia · info@accreditation.ge · Policy Framework · Legal notice · Privacy · Accessibility · Part of the PHIG network